hey Kicks, you could double-down on the irony.... Fraidycat doesn't display content, unless the content doesn't link anywhere, then you do? Just a thought. :-)
thanks Khürt! non-repudiation would be interesting, you could specify a time out for the original request, and remove your payment post after that. I think it would be up to the requester to decide what it means for the payment to not be confirmed, and indiepay.me only creates a balance from confirmed transactions.
Integrity is a bit harder, you want the confirmed balance to be provable by validating all existing payment amounts at their original urls. I was thinking it would be good to have "verified" badges, and as long as indiepay.me continues to find your original posts you get to keep it.
I believe I stole the year of the directory thing from Marty. 😁
If you had webactions on your site I wouldn't need to craft my reply url by hand.... 😁
Â
Integrity is a bit harder, you want the confirmed balance to be provable by validating all existing payment amounts at their original urls. I was thinking it would be good to have "verified" badges, and as long as indiepay.me continues to find your original posts you get to keep it.
I actually wrote about both those points when I first started thinking about the project too: https://unicyclic.com/mal/2016-06-10-credmentions_a_distributed_ledger_for_the_indieweb